Write it on a Rock

I heard about this yesterday and thought it was a great idea. One of the things President Obama mentioned during his campaign was "hope" and I have hope that some good will come of this.


Put your name and return address on a red envelope to ensure delivery. Address the envelope to:

President Barack Obama
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. -

On the back of this sealed EMPTY red envelope write the following:

This envelope represents one child who died in abortion. It is empty because that life was unable to offer anything to the world. Responsibility begins with conception.

Affix 1st class postage and mail it this Tuesday, March 31, 2009.

Awesome job on that video guys.

Saw this over at John James' blog and thought I'd give it a shot.

I think I got lucky and got West Virginia, Colorado and Missouri in the first five so that really helped on getting the accuracy of others.

I saw this article and it made me think back to some of the reports from IBM: Leadership in a distributed world: Lessons from online gaming & Online multiplayer games build business leaders

From Harvard Business Publishing
"Together, these five attributes make for employees who are flexible, resourceful, improvisational, eager for a quest, believers in meritocracy, and foes of bureaucracy. If your organization is receptive to these traits (and it should be), look for gamers and the disposition they will bring you."

The five attributes that they list out and describe;
They are bottom-line oriented.
They understand the power of diversity.
They thrive on change.
They see learning as fun.
They marinate on the "edge."

As someone who plays some online games, perhaps a bit too much sometimes, I agree with what the article says but those are attributes anyone can have as well without being an online gamer.

EDIT: Someone in the comments of the article actually mentions the IBM study from last year.

A lot of people in the sports world are blaming or seem to be blaming the Yankees' pitching for the reason they didn't do better this year. They point to Ian Kennedy & Phil Hughes and how they were a disappointment this year and perhaps should have been traded last off season for the great Johan Santana. They point to Wang's injury which left them without their ace, the pitcher with the most total wins in the last two years in MLB. They point to the injury to Joba Chamberlain and also the fact he got moved from being Rivera's setup man to a starter. I disagree with them.

While Kennedy and Hughes were pretty terrible (17 starts between them with an 0-8 record and a 7.50 E.R.A.) and losing Wang certainly hurt, it was the Yankees' bats that were the main reason they couldn't make it this year. We can look at some of the pitching stats from last year, which was the worst year since the late 90s, to this year.

2007 pitching stats

• 4.49 ERA
• .268 opponent batting average
• 777 runs allowed
• 1.43 WHIP

2008 pitching stats

• 4.28 ERA
• .266 opponent batting average
• 727 runs allowed
• 1.36 WHIP

You can see that opponents batting average was roughly the same but they had a lower WHIP this year, which means the Yankee pitchers gave up fewer walks in 2008 as well as 50 less runs allowed. While their pitching wasn't a lot better then 2007, it WAS better. Now take a look at a few hitting stats between 2007 and 2008.

2007 hitting stats

• 1656 hits
• 968 runs
• .290 batting average

2008 hitting stats

• 1512 hits
• 789 runs
• .271 batting average

That's almost 1 run a game difference. They lost 18 games by 1 run this season. 13 games by 2 runs. Give them a fourth of those games and they finish with the same record as the first place Tampa Bay Rays. While better pitching certainly could have made a difference it was timely hitting that really did them in this year.

That's a pretty big request/suggestion. I can't imagine how much they would need for all the ice cream they make.

Here's an article about it

Here's a link from PETA's website

Kevin Pang compiled this list from a question on StackOverflow.com.

For me, I think my top three, in order, would be #9 (Interruptions), #3 (Vagueness) and then #8 (Scope creep).