• Browse Blogs
  • My Blog
  • My Updates

+Tags Get help with tags?

  • View as cloud  | list

+ Similar Entries

photo

Sametime Entry 8.5 C...

Blog:  AnythingAroun...
Maurice Teeuwe
Updated 
No RatingsRatings 0     No CommentsComments 0
photo

More on 8.5.1 FP1 IF...

Blog:  Chad Scott
Chad Scott
Updated 
RatingsRatings 1     No CommentsComments 0
photo

maintain your consol...

Blog:  AnythingAroun...
Maurice Teeuwe
Updated 
No RatingsRatings 0     No CommentsComments 0
photo

If you're thinking o...

Blog:  Lotus Nut
Chris Whisonant
Updated 
RatingsRatings 1     CommentsComments 2
photo

DAOS stats - Before ...

Blog:  ... pretty fl...
Chris LeRoy
Updated 
No RatingsRatings 0     No CommentsComments 0

+ Bookmarks

+ Blog Authors  

To enable DAOS on mail.box databases or not?

Chris Whisonant |   | Tags:  mail daos attachments infrastructure server | Comments (5)  |  Visits (1,277)
Paul Mooney reminded us the other week that we should do this - and I agree! Over at Vaughan Rivett's blog, he's discussing some of the misunderstandings surrounding DAOS. He brings up several good points, but does question whether DAOS should be enabled on mail.box files. Of course, each situation may be a little different for every environment, so it's up to you to determine if you want to do this. But keep in mind that, like Vaughan states, DAOS is for any application - not just mail!

If I'm a daosified mail user and am using a CRM application to save a copy of an email message directly into the CRM, then if DAOS is enabled for the CRM application the attachment will be shared in DAOS! But if I want to send that email to a colleague and mail.box doesn't have DAOS enabled, then that attachment will be written to mail.box and then when it's delivered to the recipient's mail file DAOS would associate it as a duplicate from my mail file. But, if mail.box has DAOS enabled, then the attachment will never be pulled back out of DAOS (meaning there will not be the disk i/o associated with the transaction) and the router will know that it already existed in DAOS and not try to pull it back out. So, in most cases you will want to enable DAOS on your mail.box files. (Of course multiple server hops will not be aware of this currently, but for mail users on the same server it should be ok.)

Also remember that you'll need to enable transaction logging on your mail.box files. This may mean that you will need to disable the notes.ini settings for MailBoxDisableTXNLogging=1 and/or RM_NO_LOG_LARGE_OBJECTS=1. You will also need to manually enable transaction logging on the database with the router off by using load compact -T on each of your mail.box files.
RatingsRatings 1

Comments (5)

photo
1 Corey Davis commented   Permalink No RatingsRatings 0

When you say "Of course multiple server hops will not be aware of this currently, but for mail users on the same server it should be ok" are you saying that this will or will not work in a multi-server environment? By "will work" I mean that the attachment will be pulled out of DAOS, attached to the message and sent on to a user on another server.

photo
2 Tim E Brown commented   Permalink No RatingsRatings 0

I wonder how DAOS will play with Domino server based spam tools (ex. McAfee, Symantec, etc..) and compliance systems (ex. EMC's Legato) with mail.box? Heard anything yet?

-Tim E. Brown

photo
3 Chris Whisonant commented   Permalink No RatingsRatings 0

@1 - Sorry if that was confusing. What I mean is that DAOS will be transparent to mail routing between servers. Whether it's Notes or SMTP, the attachment will be sent without any problems - the attachment is copied from DAOS and sent like normal.

@2 - I haven't heard any specifics surrounding that. IBM has engineered DAOS to be transparent to 3rd party applications. If an application has to scan an attachment from an NSF, then it will be scanned as it normally would.

photo
4 Patrick Picard commented   Permalink No RatingsRatings 0

This may mean that you will need to disable the notes.ini settings for MailBoxDisableTXNLogging=1 and/or RM_NO_LOG_LARGE_OBJECTS=1.

Do you mean changing them to or removing them entirely?
MailBoxDisableTXNLogging=0
RM_NO_LOG_LARGE_OBJECTS=0

There are to many disable's in the sentence :)

photo
5 Chris Whisonant commented   Permalink No RatingsRatings 0

@4 - I would set them to = 0 via a configuration document. This way, it's somewhat documented that those changes were meant to be made. You could also just remove them from notes.ini completely.

Add a Comment Add a Comment

Previous |  Main  | Next
Skip to main content link. Accesskey S
IBM Lotus Connections Help Tools About